Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Luke Simkiss vs Philip Hjorth Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Simkiss vs Hjorth analysis and find out who is favored!
Luke Simkiss vs Philip Hjorth Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Simkiss 1 - 0 Hjorth
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Simkiss has won 45.51% of points on their second serve, while Hjorth has won 47.79%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Simkiss, in recent form, has won 45.39% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hjorth has won 52.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.21% and 36.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Simkiss has saved 57.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hjorth has saved 55.91% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Simkiss has won 44.44% of matches played (W/L 16/ 20), with Hjorth winning 62.5% (W/L 30/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Simkiss has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8). Hjorth has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 28/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Simkiss has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 16/ 20), where as Hjorth has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 30/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Simkiss winning 1 times and Hjorth being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Simkiss winning 2 and Hjorth winning 1. The last match between Simkiss and Hjorth was at the M25 Tavira, 11-10-2023, First, Hard with Luke Simkiss getting the victory 3-6 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Simkiss and Hjorth have played a deciding set 1 times, with Simkiss winning 1 times and Hjorth 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Simkiss winning 0, and Hjorth 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Simkiss has played against opponents with an average rank of 154.08 while Hjorth has played against players with an average rank of 62.25.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Simkiss has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hjorth has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Simkiss has converted 30% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hjorth has converted 51.16% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
862
Rank
830
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
49% (47-48)
Career Total W/L
54% (39-33)
11% (1-8)
YTD W/L
58% (14-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Luke Simkiss | Philip Hjorth |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:0:0 | 2:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (48/77) | 65% (48/74) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (37/48) | 65% (31/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (14/29) | 42% (11/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (5/15) | 20% (2/10) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (32/74) | 34% (26/77) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Luke Simkiss
Player
Philip Hjorth
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Luke Simkiss | Philip Hjorth |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 11% (1/8) | 58% (14/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 27% (6/16) | 60% (30/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (106/122) | 55% (254/211) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) | 59% (10/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 57% (4/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 14 | 25 |
| DFs per game | 0.11 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 12 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:46 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 76.56 | 29.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (285/452) | 62% (550/889) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (193/285) | 65% (358/550) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (76/167) | 48% (162/339) |
| BPs Won% Total | 30% (9/30) | 51% (44/86) |
| Return Pts W% | 32% (140/431) | 42% (359/857) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 11% (1/8) | 58% (14/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 11% (1/9) | 61% (14/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/4) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 25% (4/1) | 87% (15/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 75% (4/3) | 13% (15/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Luke Simkiss Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Luke Simkiss
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joe Tyler
Player
Luke Simkiss
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Luke Simkiss
76%
(
77 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ronetto Van Tilburg
Player
Luke Simkiss
52%
(
44 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 1-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-6(5) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Luke Simkiss
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
4
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adam Jones
Player
Luke Simkiss
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eero Vasa
Player
Luke Simkiss
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Philip Hjorth Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Verbeek
Player
Philip Hjorth
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nino Toto
Player
Philip Hjorth
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Philip Hjorth
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Giovanni Calvano
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Patrick Kaukovalta
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Patrik Munkhammar
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Filip Stidell
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcus Walters
Player
Philip Hjorth
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
6 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Philip Hjorth
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Francisco Rocha
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Simkiss Vs Hjorth Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Simkiss are available here and Hjorth photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
